anyone have any information on them other than they are prolly super expensive lol... even there RMS rating that doesnt seem to be listed?
Posts: 254 | From: Scranton,pa | Registered: May 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
i remember something about Mcvay having a pair a couple yrs ago and blowing them up in his van.
there is no power rating because when they came out treo said they couldnt be blow,lol...
Posts: 6086 | From: north rose,ny | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged |
which i beleave was there SPL monster for years... for my understanding these subs are new
Posts: 254 | From: Scranton,pa | Registered: May 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
the cxt was the replacement for the csx. i had some i tested a while back, and team walrus used the same subs at finals that year. i don't think there were many made. and i believe walrus blew the two before finals iirc.
posted
I've been seeing these at CES for 4 years now....
Muwahaha
The way a new spider plate was machined for a larger spider to be used.... was not a very good idea. It leaves about .65" for reward spider clearance over the intended spider landing.... and it offers the 9 year old motor design.
I did, however, like the cone for SQ applications.
-------------------- T3 Audio Incorporated >World Class Subwoofer & Speaker & Amplifier Development< Johnathan Demuth
"All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them."-- Walt Disney
posted
ur right 8-10 yrs ago treo was the hottness now cs is bad and subs are laquing for the times and def for the price.
i am sure you could buy a TSNS and have enough left over for a hooker and a happymeal.
Posts: 6086 | From: north rose,ny | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic