posted
Sounds good, 4 subs? Did i read that right, too early for my eyes and brain to cooperate!
What are you using for mids/highs/co-axials? I've heard a lot of good things about the 200a4, the first being that it puts out damn near 50 watts x 4, not 25 @ 4 Ohm!! Not familiar with the 180a2, will that drive your subs? Can it adiquately drive all 4?
Keep up the good work
ub
------------------ "Captain Budget" Never tick off a klingon!
Posts: 7272 | From: No. VA | Registered: May 1999
|
posted
I plan on hooking the XLC's up to the 200a4 and wireing it so they get the 200 each. My other ones will go to the 180 though. Hopefully it turns out ok.
------------------
Posts: 179 | From: Austin Minnesota (Spamtown usa) USA | Registered: Jun 1999
|
posted
i dunno what the deal on the amp is, or why no one has suggested it yet, but i would get a punch 250 or 360a2 and wire all the subs to the amp, assuming theyre 4 ohm subs, you can wire 4 4 ohm subs to get a 4 ohm mono load out of the amp, and im sure everyone will agree that will be better sounding than the 200a4..... and it doesnt cost any more.... id go with the 250 or 360 for subs, and THEN the 200a4 for the mids anyone in agreeance??
------------------ Punkin out with a killer system. sXe all the way!
posted
Sounds like a similar system to mine, except i use 2 JLW015's, but a little more power.
totally, a RF power series amp is killer, but you only need a power 250a2 to thump xlc's...my friend has a 150a2 to 2 xlc 10"s and they seem overpowered..
i think my sound pretty clear, but i need to finish dynamax, and i'm probably going to upgrade front stage.
Dukk..he might just be referring to the "tested" 180 watts, not sure..
You didn't mention what you are driving by the way..
------------------
[This message has been edited by chronic (edited 07-02-99).]
Printer-friendly view of this topic