Termpro Audio Forum
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
  
my profile | directory login | register | faq | forum home

This topic has been moved to dBDRA 2005 Rules Discussion.     next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Termpro Audio Forum » Our Archives » dB Drag Racing (2005-2006 Archives) » Matrix 2005 (Page 2)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Matrix 2005
justinDOHMAN
Senior Member
Member # 9972

Icon 1 posted      Profile for justinDOHMAN   Email justinDOHMAN   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Wayne Harris:
quote:
Originally posted by Tinted:
if u gonna do unlimited amps u need to do unlimited conductors otherwise there is no point.

how do the rules as they stand right now benefint ANY of the street competitors? tell me

The reason that amp quantity limitations were introduced was to keep the cost of Street systems reasonable. Unfortunately, several manufacturers introduced very large amps (that produced large amounts of power). These amps are quite expensive. We also introduced conductor limits. This effectively limited the number of channels that one of these large amps could have.

Manufacturers have also been circumventing the amp quantity limit by putting multiple amps in a single heatsink. Fortunately, the conductor limit once again kept things under control.

To answer your question, removing the amp quantity limitation would allow competitors to use multiple "cheap" amps to get the same power as the single "monster" amp.

I am interested to hear your perspective on how this is bad for Street competitors as compared to how the rules were in 2004.

Thanks in advance.

I think it will make street cheaper. Say I was to buy 4 crossfire 1000d's for 800 bucks. On 12v that would be around 5000-6000 watts. Or I can buy a crown for 2-5000 dolars. Same Power for alot more money.. It makes more sense to allow unlimited conductors and unlimtied amps

--------------------
Dallas Home Theater

Posts: 1772 | From: Frisco, Tx | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SPL2000
Senior Member
Member # 434

Icon 3 posted      Profile for SPL2000   Author's Homepage   Email SPL2000   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Wayne Harris:
Street Max enclosures do not need to pass the wall test but the enclosure cannot be connected to the roof or sides of the vehicle (other than cosmetically.) In addition, structural mods to the vehicle behind the B-Pillar cannot be made.

a "wall" enclosure in a street max vehicle that isnt attached to the roof and sides of the vehicle wouldnt be very safe!

--------------------
Michael Hughes

 -

Posts: 7377 | From: Lake Havasu AZ | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ShockingCanada
Senior Member
Member # 3553

Icon 1 posted      Profile for ShockingCanada   Email ShockingCanada   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think that all street classes should be limited to 2 conductors max and 1 battery max personally...just differ the number of woofers.

--------------------
 -

2008 Spring Break Nationals Street B Champion 153.2dB
Street A 154.1db
2 TF One 10" + DD Z1a + Odyssey 1750

Posts: 2949 | From: Canada | Registered: Dec 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Hakeeb
Senior Member
Member # 1434

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Hakeeb   Email Hakeeb   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by ShockingCanada:
I think that all street classes should be limited to 2 conductors max and 1 battery max personally...just differ the number of woofers.

that's what i was thinking

--------------------
 -

 -

Posts: 1464 | From: Moreno Valley/CA | Registered: Apr 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Terry Jackson
Senior Member
Member # 4601

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Terry Jackson   Author's Homepage   Email Terry Jackson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by SPL2000:
quote:
Originally posted by Wayne Harris:
Street Max enclosures do not need to pass the wall test but the enclosure cannot be connected to the roof or sides of the vehicle (other than cosmetically.) In addition, structural mods to the vehicle behind the B-Pillar cannot be made.

a "wall" enclosure in a street max vehicle that isnt attached to the roof and sides of the vehicle wouldnt be very safe!
why wouldnt it be.? It can still be secured to the floor.

--------------------
Team KICKER
Team Kinetik
2008 bassrace?
2007 -150 dbs........ooops lbs
2006 SBN Street B CHAMPION (154.1)
2006 IDBL Pro Stock 2 World record holder!!
2005 HMMMM things just didnt go right?!?!
2004 Street Max 1-2 World Finalist (6th)
2003 Super Street 1-2 NW World Finalist. (12th)
2003 H-O Alts Super Street Rookie of the Year.
 -  -

Posts: 4404 | From: FLORIDA | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
audiobuffru1
Senior Member
Member # 7489

Icon 1 posted      Profile for audiobuffru1   Author's Homepage   Email audiobuffru1   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
wall for street max, i built a box outside car and inserted incar , put a trim panel around it and then i used exspanding foam to control ceilng vibration, but roof still flexes , trim panels are secured in, would this deem the car illegal or legal for street max , wieght is a serious issue here i use this car for daily driver ..............

--------------------
ear drums are very over rated

r.i.p. greg welch

2005 dbdrags bassrace world finalist 120-129.9 3rd place finish

Posts: 956 | From: somewere in time | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

   Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


(c) 1996-2007 WHE Inc, Carson City Nevada, USA

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2