Termpro Audio Forum   
my profile | directory login | register | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Termpro Audio Forum » Our Archives » dB Drag Racing (2002-2004 Archives) » Do you think that Street, Pro-Street, and SSNW should... (Page 2)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Do you think that Street, Pro-Street, and SSNW should...
Sid Grice
Senior Member
Member # 3684

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Sid Grice   Email Sid Grice   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by lou dog:
What ever happened to having a simple box in the back?

Luin


A variety of people had different interpretations of "simple" and "Back".

--------------------
 -  -


Posts: 6186 | From: S'port, Louisiana | Registered: Jan 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JBM
Senior Member
Member # 5616

Icon 6 posted      Profile for JBM   Author's Homepage   Email JBM   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think the rear side windows because the window line of my rear side windows is a good 2 inches higher than my front windows, and my back hatch windows is too low also...

I can live with last years rules though...my box is within the rules...

--------------------
Team Pure Pressure / Powerbass / Excessive Amperage / www.southeastspl.com

 -


Posts: 1435 | From: Palm Coast, FL | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Team BIO-Rick
Senior Member
Member # 781

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Team BIO-Rick   Author's Homepage   Email Team BIO-Rick   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with you on the one too Scott, I think that it would be much easier to tell if it is at the limit.

--------------------
Rick Logan

TEAM DB DRIVEN.

 -

160+db and gaining.....

I think that I have said too much....................I must go now................the SPL Ninja's are upon me  -
Need more power? UP YOURS!! with Excessive Amperage!

Posts: 6070 | From: Northern California | Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
*1LOWSUV*
Senior Member
Member # 5176

Icon 6 posted      Profile for *1LOWSUV*     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Leave it where it's at! We already have enough problems with box height.

If you take it to the back window you still get the problems with, when measuring are you looking at the vehicle perfectly level and crap like that. Let's keep the changing of the rules to a minimum and only change things that were exploited because they were not defined more clearly.

Front or back windows it really doesn't matter, as you'll always have someone who sees it differant then everybody else.

Let's just get some rules in ink so we all can get to building .

Scott,you have too much time on your hands go take your bike apart

--------------------
 -  -


Posts: 21383 | From: ~Northern Cali~ | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Q
Senior Member
Member # 7595

Icon 2 posted      Profile for Q     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Originally posted by BUMPNDABAY!
posted 01-08-2002 10:58PM:
quote:
Leave it where it's at! We already have enough problems with box height.

Exactly why I would like to see it changed
___________________________________________________________


Well it just seems to me that being right next to the rear window would make it a lot easier tell the height than if it's 4 or 5 feet away, but maybe I'm wrong, I mean no one's perfect, so it has to happen someday, right?


_____________________________________________________________


-------------------

[ 01-10-2002: Message edited by: Q ]

--------------------
"I'm feeling very humble lately, but I'm sure I have the strength of character to fight it"
-Bob Hope

"Only YOU can prevent AMPLIFIRES!"
-jarfunkz


--------------------


Q
Senior Member
Original Member # 740
 -


Posts: 1934 | From: Somewhere Out Mountainbiking The Sierra Nevada | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Q
Senior Member
Member # 7595

Icon 11 posted      Profile for Q     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
...right?

--------------------
"I'm feeling very humble lately, but I'm sure I have the strength of character to fight it"
-Bob Hope

"Only YOU can prevent AMPLIFIRES!"
-jarfunkz


--------------------


Q
Senior Member
Original Member # 740
 -

Posts: 1934 | From: Somewhere Out Mountainbiking The Sierra Nevada | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Sid Grice
Senior Member
Member # 3684

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Sid Grice   Email Sid Grice   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Q:
...right?

Well, since you asked...

When measuring from the side windows, there are two reference points to determine if the enclosure is within standards. If we begin to use the rear window only (1 reference point), how would we know if we are properly testing the enclosure height?

The description of how to determine if an enclosure is below the window, is clear and precise. If someone does not understand the measuring technique, it would not make it more clear by changing the description. Even if there were confusion about the measuring technique, it would be better to update the current description instead of making a whole new set of measuring techniques. Improve of something you think may not be precis, not change it (which could create a new set of confusions).

but, then again, this is only my "point of view"

[ 01-10-2002: Message edited by: Sid Grice ]

--------------------
 -  -


Posts: 6186 | From: S'port, Louisiana | Registered: Jan 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Q
Senior Member
Member # 7595

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Q     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sid, I don't see a problem arising from raising (or lowering) the legal height to the rear window, sedans already have that approx. restriction, and there's nothing to stop anyone from continuing to use the same measurement 'techniques', it would just provide many nubies who have already built their systems up to the rear window, the opportunity to compete in Street (novice?) rather than lose hard in the SS1-2/SS3-4 WALL classes.

--------------------
"I'm feeling very humble lately, but I'm sure I have the strength of character to fight it"
-Bob Hope

"Only YOU can prevent AMPLIFIRES!"
-jarfunkz


--------------------


Q
Senior Member
Original Member # 740
 -

Posts: 1934 | From: Somewhere Out Mountainbiking The Sierra Nevada | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bionic
Member
Member # 6435

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bionic     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Leave SS1-2NW alone there was no bitching last year so let it ride. Super Street is
fine leave it alone. Let's get on with the season

--------------------
Scott Nelson

Posts: 151 | From: Bradenton, Florida | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Josh Schmillen
Senior Member
Member # 856

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Josh Schmillen   Author's Homepage   Email Josh Schmillen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Bionic:
Leave SS1-2NW alone there was no bitching last year so let it ride. Super Street is
fine leave it alone. Let's get on with the season

Can I get an AMEM from the congregation...

--------------------
Josh Schmillen
Art's Sound Chamber 3

Team RF
2003 SS 1-2 NW $ SS 5-8 World Champions
2004 SS 3-4 $ SS 5+ World Champions

--- 15 Combined World Titles ---


 -


Posts: 2875 | From: Moberly, MO | Registered: Dec 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Q
Senior Member
Member # 7595

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Q     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Originally posted by Q:
quote:
Originally posted by Q:

quote:

posted 01-08-2002 03:03 AM
- ahh, the wheels of progress...


I guess we'll just have to wait another year, or two...

--------------------
"I'm feeling very humble lately, but I'm sure I have the strength of character to fight it"
-Bob Hope

"Only YOU can prevent AMPLIFIRES!"
-jarfunkz


--------------------


Q
Senior Member
Original Member # 740
 -


Posts: 1934 | From: Somewhere Out Mountainbiking The Sierra Nevada | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
EricCoulter
Senior Member
Member # 6254

Icon 1 posted      Profile for EricCoulter   Author's Homepage   Email EricCoulter   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ok I have a question. I drive a Ford Explorer and I built my box to be clearly under my back windows. And everyone knows what an Explorer looks like. Now if Im under my rear windows am I ok, or if it is a hair over the front am I screwed?? Just curious, because my box is clearly a no wall and If a hairline changes that then I think it is bull.

Eric

--------------------
Team SPT (Co-Founder)

Former Super Street Deathmatch World Champions
Former Super Street 3-4 World Record Holders
Former Super Street 3-4 2nd Place World Champions
Former Super Street 5+ 2nd Place World Champions
3 Time DBDrag Street World Record Holder
3x MECA World Champion and Record Holder
And Helped a Few Break some Records along the way! And Got some help.

 -

http://www.myspace.com/rockcoulter


Posts: 1431 | From: Knox-Vegas | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Sid Grice
Senior Member
Member # 3684

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Sid Grice   Email Sid Grice   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by SPLfreak2:
Ok I have a question. I drive a Ford Explorer and I built my box to be clearly under my back windows. And everyone knows what an Explorer looks like. Now if Im under my rear windows am I ok, or if it is a hair over the front am I screwed?? Just curious, because my box is clearly a no wall and If a hairline changes that then I think it is bull.

Eric


To you, it may be "bull", but the rules are designed in a fashion that allows each and every competitor to contest against others who have similar designs. The rule was not written to see how many people it could disqualify, it was written to promote equality among competitors.

My question to you is...If you were thinking about competitng in the SS-NW class of dB Drags, and if you knew the rules for SS-NW states that the enclosure could be no higher than the window seals...why did you overlook the rule, and build something that you knew was not allowed in SS-NW class?

If the difference between the enclosure being determined as a wall or not a wall, is only a matter of a "hairline"...then the size of the the enclosure (that would allow your participation in the SS-NW class) should have been more closely examined before the final construction.

But, then again, this is only my opinion.

--------------------
 -  -


Posts: 6186 | From: S'port, Louisiana | Registered: Jan 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
EricCoulter
Senior Member
Member # 6254

Icon 1 posted      Profile for EricCoulter   Author's Homepage   Email EricCoulter   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Sid Grice:

To you, it may be "bull", but the rules are designed in a fashion that allows each and every competitor to contest against others who have similar designs. The rule was not written to see how many people it could disqualify, it was written to promote equality among competitors.

My question to you is...If you were thinking about competitng in the SS-NW class of dB Drags, and if you knew the rules for SS-NW states that the enclosure could be no higher than the window seals...why did you overlook the rule, and build something that you knew was not allowed in SS-NW class?

If the difference between the enclosure being determined as a wall or not a wall, is only a matter of a "hairline"...then the size of the the enclosure (that would allow your participation in the SS-NW class) should have been more closely examined before the final construction.

But, then again, this is only my opinion.


Well Sid, here's my point. When I designed my box, I designed it to be below the rear windows not the front windows, as I did not read the rule as meaning the front most windows, (not to say it doesn't say this), and I have no clue how I would measure the distance from the flat bed of my cargo area floor to the hieght of my front window, this would be a mear guess, and thus make it subjective. Plus the window hieght on Ford Explorer's does not vary very much as the window's go back, so my point is that it would be stupid for my box to be considered a wall when it is and inch under my rear windows and possibly a hair over my front windows, but I do understand that rules are rules for reasons. I just dont think that the rule was designed for the hairline difference in the front and rear windows of an Explorer.

Everybody just ignore my ranting please, as it carries no weight to any arguement anyways, just my humble opinion. Oh yea Im not diong super street anyways, Im diong Street.

Eric

--------------------
Team SPT (Co-Founder)

Former Super Street Deathmatch World Champions
Former Super Street 3-4 World Record Holders
Former Super Street 3-4 2nd Place World Champions
Former Super Street 5+ 2nd Place World Champions
3 Time DBDrag Street World Record Holder
3x MECA World Champion and Record Holder
And Helped a Few Break some Records along the way! And Got some help.

 -

http://www.myspace.com/rockcoulter


Posts: 1431 | From: Knox-Vegas | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


(c) 1996-2007 WHE Inc, Carson City Nevada, USA

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2