Termpro Audio Forum   
my profile | directory login | register | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Termpro Audio Forum » Our Archives » dBDRA 2004 Rules Discussion (Archive) » Subs in hatchback cars

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Subs in hatchback cars
Dr.Loudness
Senior Member
Member # 969

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Dr.Loudness   Author's Homepage   Email Dr.Loudness   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is allowed to have 100% used trunk in sedan cars,

It is allowed to have sub on rear shelf

but it is not alowed to have trunk part 100% used in hachback ans SW cars = sub box up to the rear shelf.

In HB and SW you must look for window line and not what actualy car manufacturer ment to be used as trunk.

Many cars in Europe have trunk part of car higher as side window line.

Can we change that in new rules? I think that side window line is not the best way.


Peter Pejovic

Retail member '02-'03

Posts: 1820 | From: Ljubljana, Slovenia | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
*Krisa*
Senior Member
Member # 1780

Icon 1 posted      Profile for *Krisa*   Author's Homepage   Email *Krisa*   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Side window lines are higher than the front window lines - which is where hatches have had to build to the past couple years. The trade off of having a hatch, is often less workable area for an enclosure than a trunk. And while sedans have more airspace in the trunk area - hatches have a natural advantage when it comes to physics. It's a trade-off of sorts.

This isn't a new "ruling" or concept and in fact if the rule is changing to side window line, it's going to give most hatches more room to play with.

--------------------
When you find yourself standing in a hole and holding a shovel, stop digging.

Certified IASCA/idbl Judge ** 2002 IASCA SQ Points Champ
** IASCA Pro Street 601+ * USACi Pro 601+ * SLAP Pro Street 601+ **
Team Gates ** dBs

Posts: 5428 | From: Orlando, Florida | Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dr.Loudness
Senior Member
Member # 969

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Dr.Loudness   Author's Homepage   Email Dr.Loudness   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I know it is nothing new, but now is time to debate about possible changes in rules.

It is much easier to judge and inspect cars if hatchbacks could use full trunk space as it is ment to be from car manufacturer.

Hatchbacks are already louder in average, but in my opinion it is matter of fairnes and how easy can rules be told to new competitors.

Posts: 1820 | From: Ljubljana, Slovenia | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
*Krisa*
Senior Member
Member # 1780

Icon 1 posted      Profile for *Krisa*   Author's Homepage   Email *Krisa*   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, now isn't the time to debate rules changes - that was two weeks ago before the near-final draft came about.

It is not tough to say "behind here, below here".

For example, according to Honda, the CRX has an average of 55 cubic feet of "cargo space" including all of the area behind the b-pillar. If we go by factory definitions, you'd practically have to wall the vehicle to use all the cargo space the manufacturer says it has.

--------------------
When you find yourself standing in a hole and holding a shovel, stop digging.

Certified IASCA/idbl Judge ** 2002 IASCA SQ Points Champ
** IASCA Pro Street 601+ * USACi Pro 601+ * SLAP Pro Street 601+ **
Team Gates ** dBs

Posts: 5428 | From: Orlando, Florida | Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


(c) 1996-2007 WHE Inc, Carson City Nevada, USA

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2