Termpro Audio Forum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Termpro Audio Forum » Installer's Corner » SPL » Closer the box of the sensor, higher the Resonant F???

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Closer the box of the sensor, higher the Resonant F???
fecupe2001
New Member
Member # 37256

Icon 1 posted      Profile for fecupe2001   Email fecupe2001   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hey guys, i have a quick question, i have a suzuki Swift 2009, iīm building for AD NW with a single DD 3518 18" and 5000 RMS,i built the box 4 c/f after displacement and 2 8" external ports, they are 17" long each one, the box itīs on the back seat area, well, i tried cutting down the ports and the number went down, i got them longer and it went down, i shrink down the box with some woods and the number went down, funny thing itīs that the peak never changed (57 hz), i thought that my carīs frequency would be higher with the box so close to the windshield, this means that my box is too small and the ports are too short???

Said that, i took a sealed box, ran a sweep and the peak was 48 hz WTF???? so, is this normal??? if the box is closer to the sensor the FR itīs lower??? i need some help here, i couldnīt get more than 148.4 dbs :S:S:S:S

Posts: 20 | From: Panama | Registered: Aug 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
D-Bass
Senior Member
Member # 13717

Icon 1 posted      Profile for D-Bass   Author's Homepage   Email D-Bass   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
try less port area. that might show a little more which way to go
Posts: 5494 | From: Columbus, OH - formerly FL | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
fecupe2001
New Member
Member # 37256

Icon 1 posted      Profile for fecupe2001   Email fecupe2001   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
a single 8" maybe??? i wish i could get a single 10" but i couldnīt find 10" PVC to test, maybe an 8" and a 6"? hahaha.
Posts: 20 | From: Panama | Registered: Aug 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
davor-ri
New Member
Member # 35566

Icon 1 posted      Profile for davor-ri   Email davor-ri   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
single 8".... freq is ok....what have you espect? not every car is panda :lol: there are lot of things that influence on res. freq...shape of the car....car interior..etc...

--------------------
2xAlpine type R 12"&Gz amp=151,1dB - no panda..just a normal car....
2xAlpine subs+1950wrms=148,3dB - ported by LB audio

Posts: 81 | From: Croatia | Registered: Jul 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
D-Bass
Senior Member
Member # 13717

Icon 1 posted      Profile for D-Bass   Author's Homepage   Email D-Bass   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
i would have expected the vehicles resonance to be between 48-51Hz
Posts: 5494 | From: Columbus, OH - formerly FL | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
2lo2flo
New Member
Member # 25481

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 2lo2flo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
^^

I was thinking more along the lines of 54-55hz,

When doing the sealed box test, did you have any bass boost on your headunit or crossover? This makes a difference

Posts: 77 | From: Miami | Registered: Jul 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


(c) 1996-2007 WHE Inc, Carson City Nevada, USA

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2