posted
Is there anybody on this forum that Kicker Solo X 12's. Cause I am building a system that consist of 4 kicker Solo X 12's Powered by 4 soundstream xxx 6500's in a wall. Are they really good for competitions?
Posts: 14 | From: United States Virgin Islands | Registered: Oct 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Toby used to run the soundstream 6500's on 4 soloX 12's, but his was a ST-C setup
Posts: 5494 | From: Columbus, OH - formerly FL | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Do you know what there scores were like? I am made all the neccesary adjustments and upgrades to supply them with all the power they will need.
Posts: 14 | From: United States Virgin Islands | Registered: Oct 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Catergory 5: Do you know what there scores were like? I am made all the neccesary adjustments and upgrades to supply them with all the power they will need.
quote:Originally posted by 1banginbuick: i thought toby had the 10,000's
you might be right. he switched stuff around a lot. i thought it was the 6500's because of size/space. I know it was later the Sampsons
Posts: 5494 | From: Columbus, OH - formerly FL | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Team Maxxsonics Team T3 Audio Team XS POWER First 160+ on April 25/2009
2008 World finals ss 1/2 3rd with a 154.5 2007 World Finals ss 1/2 NW 3rd with a 150.0 Posts: 1820 | From: n w ohio | Registered: Dec 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
May i ask how many cubes, the port area, port lenght and the amount of batts used to achieve the 173.5db and also what upgrades did u do to the vehicle? if u don`t mind me asking.
Posts: 299 | From: virgin islands | Registered: Jun 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
do you think inside the box is too small? that is one of the things that is frightening with my performance.
Posts: 14 | From: United States Virgin Islands | Registered: Oct 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Catergory 5: are these boxes capable of hitting the 165db?
No way that these enclosures will be able to do a 165... my guess is 155-157 if you are lucky.... they way you designed your boxes really limits what you can do to tune them. the way the port is layed out I cant think of a way to modify it and the speaker chambers are a really funny shape which might result in some loading issues. Hope it all works out for you but I would have just built a regular wall instead of those two boxes... plus you need alot more power to do that kind of number in a SS setup with that little of cone area
-------------------- The Boyscouts Of America are honoring Michael Jackson by flying there pants at half mast Posts: 376 | From: Somewhere | Registered: Feb 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
i have known people with these types of boxes and they have performed very well. As far as loading is concern I have loaded them and it wasn't a problem. Just haven't metered the car yet. Posts: 14 | From: United States Virgin Islands | Registered: Oct 2008
| IP: Logged |
This is the proximity from the box to the dash. The dash has been reinforced with 1" MDF, foam, fiberglass and it also has been sealed off so there are no vents, etc.
Posts: 14 | From: United States Virgin Islands | Registered: Oct 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
You would be better off with a common chamber driver side port enclosure than that. In an extreme vehicle, your tuning is going to be higher, and those ports look way too long to get a higher tune. I also don't like the angles behind the baffle. I think it will make the woofers cones load weird under pressure.
posted
by loading, they don't mean mounting the subs. It's the way the wave/airpressure behind the sub affects the woofer
Posts: 5494 | From: Columbus, OH - formerly FL | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
just a bit of progress I am still going to try my luck with the box and see what happens
Posts: 14 | From: United States Virgin Islands | Registered: Oct 2008
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic