eclipse vs mmats

my profile | directory login | register | faq | forum home

»	Termpro Audio Forum » Our Archives » General Audio (1999-2001 Archives) » eclipse vs mmats

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!

Author

Topic: eclipse vs mmats

http://members.sounddomain.com/slammin86

slammin86
Member
Member # 6054

posted

how would a mmats juggernaut compair to an eclipse alunimum?
thanks

--------------------
current system:
pioneer premier 930
eclipse 8052 component set
powered by us acoustics 2150
15 inch eclipse titanium
powered by a rockford BD 1500.1
all lightning audio wire and a batcap 400

hittin 142.7 @ 40 hz on the new mics

http://members.sounddomain.com/slammin86

Posts: 173 | From: Springfield, MO | Registered: Aug 2001 | IP: Logged |

quote:

Originally posted by slammin86:
how would a mmats juggernaut compair to an eclipse alunimum?
thanks

No comparison, the Jugg.

--------------------
Who needs a team? You kick azz in the lanes for yourself, nobody else.

Team Solo
Member
Member # 6020

posted

quote:
Originally posted by slammin86:
how would a mmats juggernaut compair to an eclipse alunimum?
thanks

No comparison, the Jugg.

--------------------
Who needs a team? You kick azz in the lanes for yourself, nobody else.

Posts: 124 | From: USA | Registered: Aug 2001 | IP: Logged |

quote:

Originally posted by Team OX:

No comparison, the Jugg.

I must agree.

--------------------
:::JMANN:::
MY GARAGE!
Cerwin-Vega! ~ HiFonics~ Pioneer ~ Alpine

Jay Gold
Senior Member
Member # 4735

posted

quote:
Originally posted by Team OX:

No comparison, the Jugg.

I must agree.

--------------------
:::JMANN:::
MY GARAGE!
Cerwin-Vega! ~ HiFonics~ Pioneer ~ Alpine

Posts: 2850 | From: South Euclid, Ohio (just outside of Cleveland) | Registered: Apr 2001 | IP: Logged |

Shawn Fleming
Senior Member
Member # 2896

posted

I would also say go with the juggs!

--------------------
Shawn Fleming
Team Fi
Team Kicker
Team Kinetik
Team Powermaster
Second Skin Audio

Livin Loud Through Fidelity

Posts: 3889 | From: Newberry, FL | Registered: Sep 2000 | IP: Logged |

http://members.sounddomain.com/slammin86

slammin86
Member
Member # 6054

posted

what if each sub was recieving 900 watts, and the eclipse sub was a 15 in a ported enclosure, and the mmats was a 12 in a sealed enclosure, then would the eclipse have a chance?

--------------------
current system:
pioneer premier 930
eclipse 8052 component set
powered by us acoustics 2150
15 inch eclipse titanium
powered by a rockford BD 1500.1
all lightning audio wire and a batcap 400

hittin 142.7 @ 40 hz on the new mics

http://members.sounddomain.com/slammin86

Posts: 173 | From: Springfield, MO | Registered: Aug 2001 | IP: Logged |

quote:

Originally posted by slammin86:
what if each sub was recieving 900 watts, and the eclipse sub was a 15 in a ported enclosure, and the mmats was a 12 in a sealed enclosure, then would the eclipse have a chance?

--------------------
Obviously you don't know who we think we are.
SBAudio

Conclusive
Senior Member
Member # 1371

posted

quote:
Originally posted by slammin86:
what if each sub was recieving 900 watts, and the eclipse sub was a 15 in a ported enclosure, and the mmats was a 12 in a sealed enclosure, then would the eclipse have a chance?

--------------------
Obviously you don't know who we think we are.
SBAudio

Posts: 6094 | From: Raleigh,NC | Registered: Mar 2000 | IP: Logged |

quote:

first of juggs are only recommended in a ported box. i still put my money on the juggs

--------------------
JRS AUDIOWORKS
MMATS PROFESSIONAL AUDIO
BEYOND AUDIO
RW AUDIO
CHAPAUDIO FORUM

Team AMP #239
Team AudioWorks #001

whybeshy
Member
Member # 2118

posted

quote:
Originally posted by slammin86:
what if each sub was recieving 900 watts, and the eclipse sub was a 15 in a ported enclosure, and the mmats was a 12 in a sealed enclosure, then would the eclipse have a chance?

first of juggs are only recommended in a ported box. i still put my money on the juggs

--------------------
JRS AUDIOWORKS
MMATS PROFESSIONAL AUDIO
BEYOND AUDIO
RW AUDIO
CHAPAUDIO FORUM

Team AMP #239
Team AudioWorks #001

Posts: 293 | From: guam (middle of the pacific ocean) | Registered: Jun 2000 | IP: Logged |

quote:

Originally posted by whybeshy:
first of juggs are only recommended in a ported box. i still put my money on the juggs

http://members.sounddomain.com/slammin86

slammin86
Member
Member # 6054

posted

i thought that it was only ported also.
the deal is one of my friends wants to make a bet. he wants to bet me 100 dollars that his 12 inch jugg in a sealed box will beat my 15 inch eclipse in a ported box.
do you think i have no chance and should not take the bet?

quote:
Originally posted by whybeshy:
first of juggs are only recommended in a ported box. i still put my money on the juggs

--------------------
current system:
pioneer premier 930
eclipse 8052 component set
powered by us acoustics 2150
15 inch eclipse titanium
powered by a rockford BD 1500.1
all lightning audio wire and a batcap 400

hittin 142.7 @ 40 hz on the new mics

http://members.sounddomain.com/slammin86

Posts: 173 | From: Springfield, MO | Registered: Aug 2001 | IP: Logged |

Currently serving my country as an Activated Army Soldier - Praying to be demobilized so I can get to work on my Monte!

JVC KD-SH99 + Clarion EQ750 in-dash equalizer-crossover
Eclipse 3242
MMATS D300HC
A/D/S/ 336is.2 6.5" component set
Crystal CMP15 x 2 @ 2.5 cubic feet per sub
PG wiring accessories
Jacob's Electronics Accuvolt FR-1500 voltage regulator/step-up transformer on MMATS amp
(all sitting in boxes [Frown]

)

Wagz
New Member
Member # 8177

posted

Dude, Juggs always win, and a tight box helps....oh wait, you guys are talking about car audio, right? Oooops!

--------------------

Currently serving my country as an Activated Army Soldier - Praying to be demobilized so I can get to work on my Monte!

JVC KD-SH99 + Clarion EQ750 in-dash equalizer-crossover
Eclipse 3242
MMATS D300HC
A/D/S/ 336is.2 6.5" component set
Crystal CMP15 x 2 @ 2.5 cubic feet per sub
PG wiring accessories
Jacob's Electronics Accuvolt FR-1500 voltage regulator/step-up transformer on MMATS amp
(all sitting in boxes )

Posts: 39 | From: Ft McCoy, WI | Registered: Dec 2001 | IP: Logged |

quote:

Originally posted by slammin86:
i thought that it was only ported also.
the deal is one of my friends wants to make a bet. he wants to bet me 100 dollars that his 12 inch jugg in a sealed box will beat my 15 inch eclipse in a ported box.
do you think i have no chance and should not take the bet?

Well a 12 sealed shouldn't be able to come close to a ported 15, and if the guidelines of the bet are that, then I would take his $100 for sure, now if he said the 12 was ported it'd be a different story.

--------------------
:::JMANN:::
MY GARAGE!
Cerwin-Vega! ~ HiFonics~ Pioneer ~ Alpine

Jay Gold
Senior Member
Member # 4735

posted

quote:
Originally posted by slammin86:
i thought that it was only ported also.
the deal is one of my friends wants to make a bet. he wants to bet me 100 dollars that his 12 inch jugg in a sealed box will beat my 15 inch eclipse in a ported box.
do you think i have no chance and should not take the bet?

Posts: 2850 | From: South Euclid, Ohio (just outside of Cleveland) | Registered: Apr 2001 | IP: Logged |

Sidulator
Member
Member # 1629

posted

No contest...MMats all the way

--------------------
"And of course if you're not down with that, we got 2 words for ya"

Posts: 212 | From: MN | Registered: Apr 2000 | IP: Logged |

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: