posted
I have received several emails asking for specific details regarding the definition of a Pro competitor. I believe that the Ama vs Pro distinction is pretty clear-cut. If you receive compensation (money, equipment, labor, etc.), you are a Pro.
The dBDRA defines a "PRO" competitor as follows...
A pro is someone who meets one or more of the following criteria:
Anyone who is employed in the auto sound industry.
Anyone who is sponsored by someone in the auto sound industry.
Anyone who purchases auto sound equipment at below fair-market prices.
Anyone who has competed as a pro in the past.
Anyone who obtains their equipment directly from the manufacturer.
Anyone who advertises a specific brand of product or service on their vehicle. (With the exception of reasonably sized equipment decals.)
Anyone who receives any type of compensation related to auto sound or auto sound competition. (Including money, vouchers, labor, equipment, etc.)
Most of these items were defined in the 1998 rule book. Although we will still be creating a new Novice division for 2002, the Street Division is still intended for amateur competitors.
-------------------- "Keep it Loud and Make me Proud!"
posted
I agree with all of this. Except this one isn't that important:
Anyone who advertises a specific brand of product or service on their vehicle. (With the exception of reasonably sized equipment decals.)
quote:Most of these items were defined in the 1998 rule book. Although we will still be creating a new Novice division for 2002, the Street Division is still intended for amateur competitors.
I agree.
[ 01-21-2002: Message edited by: SPLCivic ]
--------------------
Posts: 14 | From: So Cal | Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
So all these internet based companies none of them would be allowed to have custoemrs compete in street class????
Do to the fact a lot of companies are over the internet nowadays......
I am just curious it is of no concern to me but what if someone buys stuff off of EBAY???
How do we seperate the pros though?? Like how do we know for sure people arent gettign stuff for cheaper and then getting a fake reciept that says they paid full pop???
Thats my problem
-------------------- Team Beyond Audio Team FX AUDIO Ben DelGrosso 8th in the world SS 1-2 no wall 2001
2 Beyond Audio Inhuman 18's for 2002 Thanks to Donald Hebig, Ray Choy, Rob Oszust, RW Audio and Crossfire.
Posts: 400 | From: Sherwood Park, Alberta | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
yes, that was the only thing that struck me as being possibly unfair..."anyone who obtains their equipment directly from the manufacturer". as was mentioned...almost everyone who runs DD (and Beyond Audio, Treo i believe also, etc) would be automatically stuck in the pro class because few people sell them locally.
i understand the reasoning behind this reason, but i think it's already been taken care of with other guidelines such as receiving equipment below fair-market cost and sponsorships.
-------------------- To cheat is to admit defeat
--------------------------------- Loud...it's when you can see the ground move, it's when you have to force yourself to breath, it's when the rest of the world ceases to exist.
quote:Originally posted by Wayne Harris: ...Anyone who receives any type of compensation related to auto sound or auto sound competition. (Including money, vouchers, labor, equipment, etc.)...
How about free measurements? We all know that it is impossible to have good results without measurements, and how many amaters have measuring gear or can afford to pay full price?
I think that it is good idea to separate pros from amaters, but it is also very hard to monitor and check that. This can cause many conflicts!
Peter Pejovic
Posts: 1820 | From: Ljubljana, Slovenia | Registered: Jan 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
but in the voting it says no one that gets this kind of treatment can compete in any of the street classes, street, or the new entry level class.... so whats more important is why have a street and an entry level then, since both of those competitors will fall in the entry level..
also, will those that qualified for finals last year be allowed? I don't see anything changing that.
-------------------- Matt Brandsoy 2000 Street 1-2 Champion Team CRX Team Sweet Sounds "Rumble Bee"
Posts: 2471 | From: Austin, MN USA | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
If you have ever worked for a retailer before are you considered a pro (regardless of when and how long you worked)?
Does this include chain stores, such as Best Buy and Circuit City?
Can someone who has worked for a store before, but no longer does, purchase equipment at a fair-market price (and prove that they did) and then compete in the street class.
Also, about the equipment directly from the manufacturer or at fair market prices, that means that anyone who got a D2 from Earthquake from their competitor program, or got ID subs straight from Image, or even the Zapco amps direct is now not allowed to compete in the street class? Also to my understanding, that would mean that you would have to purchase DD, Treo, and Shocker subs from a "retailer" or you couldn't run them in the street class.
I think there was a misunderstanding about the continuation of the "old street" class when the discussion changed from Pro Street to Old Street and a Novice class. If you use the above guidelines, I feel that there will be very few people in the Street class. Most competitors who are making a run for Finals have broken or will break one of those criteria stated above.
I will admit that by the above definition I am a pro. I worked for a shop for less than a year, and that shop doesn't even carry car audio anymore. We didn't have a meter to read over 135 dB. Yes, I purchased the 2 subs and 1 amp that are in my truck through an employee discount, but it would have been stupid for me not to use it when I could. Its not like I couldn't have purchased them myself as everything was under $2000 retail.
I thought the Street was for both the newer and the seasoned competitor to compete in a class that has a severe amount of limitations on it, or who doesn't have the ability to have a dedicated competition vehicle and must compete with their daily driver. I think if this definition would have been given when the discussion for the "Pro" Street class was done, I belive there would be several who would have changed their opinion. From what I can tell, most of the people "pushing" for the continuation of the Street class at finals are Pro's by the above definitions and would not be allowed to compete.
I don't that this works for the same way that it didn't work back in 1999. A Pro can build a complete system for anyone and even though they're an Amateur, they have a "Pro" system. If I can't compete, I plan on building several systems for people who can. And I'm sure that anyone with a sizeable bankroll could walk into one of the top line shops (Sweet Sounds, Pure Sound, Classic Stereo in Ft. Wayne, Excel Audio, etc.) and walk out with a World Finals level system.
Also, could I build a Team vehicle and just let someone else push the button. For example, have a Team Shedluv, and use my truck and my equipment and let my g/f burp it? I mean she has never competed before or worked at a shop, so she's an amateur and can run in Street. So if you have a team of competitors, can NONE of them be a Pro?
I just think this will create a lot more loopholes that will be exploited and put a lot of people who should be in this class out of it. Now the street discussion will not be about cheater amps or illegal boxes, but about who built the system. Does it really matter if its loud? Why should one individual with the exact same system as someone else be restricted from competing because of who they are or what they know? Sounds a little like discrimination to me.
[ 01-22-2002: Message edited by: Shedluv ]
-------------------- Team Shedluv Team Sweep Team Kicker Team JBL
posted
I compete in Pro in IASCA SQ, but by choice (I paid retail prices for my gear via retail channels, and felt it wasn't 'sporting' to go after locals in AMA classes), so I guess I'm out too by the letter of the rule.
There's no way I'm gonna molest a perfectly decent car to make a competitive SS 1-2 or SS 1-2 NW car, with no disparagement towards anyone who runs those classes.
Ohwell.
-------------------- Carlton Duty Jr. (Undisclosed)
Posts: 288 | From: Chino Hills, CA, USA | Registered: Sep 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
It is to my understanding that the new "Pro Street class" will allow "pro's" in it, correct? And this class will be offered at finals and for points? And the entry level class will not have points offered? and won't be at finals? Please let me know so I can give you my opinion on this matter.
-------------------- Alan Riley Art's Sound Chamber
Fifteen Time SPL World Champions-----26 SPL World Records DB Drag == IASCA == USACi == MECA
Our stats page Posts: 2554 | From: Flower Mound, TX USA | Registered: Jun 1999
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by alrile: It is to my understanding that the new "Pro Street class" will allow "pro's" in it, correct? And this class will be offered at finals and for points? And the entry level class will not have points offered? and won't be at finals? Please let me know so I can give you my opinion on this matter.
Alan, there is no "Pro Street" class. That name used in the discussions is just the Street class now (just like last year) and will go to finals (that is what this post is about). The class for the newbies will be a novice class, but will not be called Street.
quote: Although we will still be creating a new Novice division for 2002, the Street Division is still intended for amateur competitors.
-------------------- Team Shedluv Team Sweep Team Kicker Team JBL
quote:Originally posted by Wayne Harris: I have received several emails asking for specific details regarding the definition of a Pro competitor. I believe that the Ama vs Pro distinction is pretty clear-cut. If you receive compensation (money, equipment, labor, etc.), you are a Pro.
The dBDRA defines a "PRO" competitor as follows...
A pro is someone who meets one or more of the following criteria:
Anyone who is employed in the auto sound industry.
Anyone who is sponsored by someone in the auto sound industry.
Anyone who purchases auto sound equipment at below fair-market prices.
Anyone who has competed as a pro in the past.
Anyone who obtains their equipment directly from the manufacturer.
Anyone who advertises a specific brand of product or service on their vehicle. (With the exception of reasonably sized equipment decals.)
Anyone who receives any type of compensation related to auto sound or auto sound competition. (Including money, vouchers, labor, equipment, etc.)
Most of these items were defined in the 1998 rule book. Although we will still be creating a new Novice division for 2002, the Street Division is still intended for amateur competitors.
I do agree with you on this list, however with that said.... I feel there is no way to police this. This is what will happen. Some kid with a loot pulls up with a completely paid for and legit competition car that does high #'s....the first thing is all others that this kid beats are going to immediately throw out there that this kid is sponsored or got his equipment cheap, or whatever. Point being that there is no way to police this. I wish there was.
-------------------- Alan Riley Art's Sound Chamber
Fifteen Time SPL World Champions-----26 SPL World Records DB Drag == IASCA == USACi == MECA
Our stats page
Posts: 2554 | From: Flower Mound, TX USA | Registered: Jun 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
1. Trailored Vehicle to show 2. More than 3 years of competiting 3. Qualified or wants to qualify for finals. 4. Work for or Own a stereo shop. 5. Work for a Manufacture. 6. Received equipment for free (sponsorship: doesn't happen unless you know something) 7. Discount Pricing does not matter(no way to police, can be accessed by anyone somewhere) 8. Advertising doesn't matter 9. Purchasing direct to manufacture doesn't matter
***Team Nutz***Team Force*** 2006 DB Drag Overall Death Match Champions 2006 Db Drag World Finals 2nd Place 2005 Db Drag Street Max Death Match Champions 2005 Db Drag World Finals 3rd Place 2001 Db Drag World Finals 3rd Place 2000 Db Drag World Finals 3rd Place 2000 IASCA Idbl World Finals 3rd Place Posts: 846 | From: Pittsburgh, PA | Registered: May 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
To keep this simple.. Here is my definition of a "pro".
-Anyone who has previously competed at World Finals.
Anything else, (in my opinion) would be impossible to regulate. How could we possibly know who has received discounts and who hasnt? How do we know that Joe Schmoe from Kentucky works at a shop? All these things would just induce more confusion.
We know who has been to finals and who has not (I'm sure this is all kept on record somewhere). There is no arguing or "pointing of fingers", just facts.
Requiring dB Drag officials and Local Retailers to police who is a Pro and who is not is going to be very difficult. I like the Finals idea, as it is on the dB Drag website under the competitor stats, anyone, anywhere can find that information with internet access. If people were upset about the "whining" that went on last year from the street competitors, there will be nothing but more this year if it goes into who got discounts, who didn't, who worked for Best Buy one summer, etc. Also this could even be hard to enforce with team names. For example, if a former street world champion is on someone else's team and does not burp the vehicle, but builds the system and is with them at all of the shows, how would you classify that?
-------------------- Team Shedluv Team Sweep Team Kicker Team JBL
posted
Shedluv has a valid point. How can this be policed??? It can't! Only way that this can be done is if world finals attendees were not allowed in the street division. But, wasn't a novice street created so that the street class could have PRO's return since this may be the only class that they can afford or for whatever reasons including vehicle restriction ie:daily driver etc. be competing in. I know that this is my situation. If I can't run street I will not and cannot compete this year. But, like Shedluv stated, many stereo shops build cars for people and then they make finals. I know that Danny has built a few in the last few years and that is great. Are you now going to say that if your car is loud and it was built by "said shop" and "said owner or installer" is a past champion then that vehicle must move into SS or further??? That is crazy. I am discouraged at this point and am looking for some clarification. Thank you.
posted
The way it needs to be policed is: If you want points you are in one class, if you dont want points, you are in another class.
-------------------- Bobby Riley Art's Sound Chamber
Fifteen time SPL World Champions-----26 SPL World Records DB Drag == IASCA == USACi == MECA Posts: 3500 | From: Retirement Village in Branson Missouri. | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by JustboB: The way it needs to be policed is: If you want points you are in one class, if you dont want points, you are in another class.
I agree. I want points. No, I don't want fries with that.
-------------------- Team Shedluv Team Sweep Team Kicker Team JBL
posted
Ok..i'm not a street class competitor, but i agree with alan that there is going to be major difficulty policeing this. If wayne is going to have two style of street classes, make the street class for finals for pros. And then teh novice one for guys/gals who aren't worried about going to finals right now. To me we are all pros if we are trying to get to finals. I think it is wrong to force a guy to modify his car to compete in a different class. I think it is neat to watch street competitors do different things to make the car louder. Lets have a pro class in street. Don't make the competitors modify there car or in some cases buy a new car for competiting.
Big Ed
-------------------- "Big" Ed Bausman Team Sweep Team Kicker MMMMMMMMMMMM....B@tch!...It'll getcha drunk!
Proud member of: TEAM SWEEP |TEAM KICKER Team Shedluv
Posts: 2220 | From: Bella Vista, Ar | Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thank you Big Ed. You made an excellent point and even agreed with some of what I was saying as well. I thought that this was the intentions of creating a class for beginners, so that the individuals that have competed in street and choose not to move up for whatever reason can stay there. I hope that Wayne catches this.
quote:Originally posted by fixxxer: To keep this simple.. Here is my definition of a "pro".
-Anyone who has previously competed at World Finals.
Anything else, (in my opinion) would be impossible to regulate. How could we possibly know who has received discounts and who hasnt? How do we know that Joe Schmoe from Kentucky works at a shop? All these things would just induce more confusion.
We know who has been to finals and who has not (I'm sure this is all kept on record somewhere). There is no arguing or "pointing of fingers", just facts.
[ 01-22-2002: Message edited by: fixxxer ]
RIGHT ON THE MONEY!!!! If you have been invited or attended finals (as a competitor-duh) YOU ARE A PRO-SIMPLE. I know it leaves loop-holes like have someone else run a person's car but how many people are going to stoop to that level just to win a plastic trophy. Come on people stop trying to find ways of getting around the rules and just play by the rules. Most of us here know what class they really belong in so lets just "Get this party started" with some official 2002 rules.